今天让INSPECTOR 看了一个50多年的HOUSE， 典型的红砖的那种，发现问题如下：
1， 房子几米远有一个老树，已经砍掉，但是还有树桩，上面有白蚁，担心白蚁会顺着树根到达房子下面，因为树根好像已经到达房子下面；
2， 还有2到3棵大叔，树根INSPECTOR说也已经到达房子下面，
3， 房子下面除了有砖支撑外，还有几个竖起的木头支持，INSPECTOR建议换掉木头，改成铁的，怕将来万一白蚁顺着木头上去，到达地板和房间，
4，房顶瓦块有破裂的，房顶锡纸有漏雨现象；
5，房顶上的线路比较混乱，建议找人整理；
6，屋檐周围的铁皮有的已经生锈破裂，建议修补
7，建议装2个 房顶的抽风装置
总结是，房子没有大的问题，以上这些说都可以修理和处理，以上问题主要是因为房东没有好好护理所导致。
目前这个房子要拍卖，大致价格也不会因为以上原因而便宜多少， 请大家帮助分析，以上这些毛病修理的话，大致需要多少钱啊，这个房子值得买吗，
谢谢，欢迎任何建议。 估计价格也在1.1MM以上。
IT IS AT SYDNEY NORTH
评论
都不是问题，买到赚到
评论
Location?
评论
買地皮
评论
LZ你太有钱了，打算花110万买这样的房子。
评论
50年了你还期望房子像你心目中的完美无瑕哦。
给个地址吧，哥们；
评论
如果是悉尼这里主要是地皮和地点, 老砖房可能比新的还结实, 价格不会便宜太多.
评论
给个地址大家去捧场（抢）
评论
DINGDING
评论
楼主怕大家去抢，呵呵
评论
拆了重盖
评论
买买买！有钱不任性一回！
评论
买房其实是买地和房
你重点描述了房子的问题，没有说地
位置如何？同区域内价格相比是中间价还是略高还是略低？最近这个区房价变化如何？地的面积多少？Section 32当中有没有开发潜力？
你说值不值得买，是值不值得买来自主，还是值不值得买来投资？
感觉信息太少无法判断哦
评论
4-7基本所有的老房子都会给加上这么几条，标配来着。
评论
do you know how much it will cost if fix it, thanks
评论
全部整一下，怎么也得好几千吧。
我买房的时候也有这些，根本没理他。事实证明瓦片都好好的根本不漏。下了那么多次近乎storm的大雨，一点事没有。
评论
THANKS, 700 LAND,
评论
it is not for investment, as this property is close to my and my wife's office, at northern beach.
评论
thanks, do you have any clue in relation to 1 , 2 , 3 ? how much it will cost to fix it, i am worrying about the ants.
thanks, i am in office, can not type chinese now.
评论
楼主列了这么多，还是看别的房子吧。合适的总归会有
评论
this is the pest report, why so many high risk ?
1.1. The conditions in the roof void of the property created a high risk for timber pests to attack the property.
1.4.1.5. There were insulation, some torn sarkings, high moisture contents, poor ventilation, cracked structures, skylight, loose electrical wires, thick dust, timber pests, ants, watermarks, water leakage and blemishes in the roof void. The above may conceal possible damages. The skillion roof was inaccessible. There were timber structures to conceal the roof void. The roof void was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. Furthermore, there were some torn sarkings, which allow water to leak through to the roof void. There was visible evidence of timber pests attack in the roof void. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the roof void to cause damages. In addition to the above, the roof void of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pests attack.
2.4. The edges of the roof void were inaccessible.
2.5. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the edges of the roof void to cause damages.
3.1. The conditions in the interior of the property created a high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
3.4.3.5. There were high moisture contents and poor ventilation on the ceiling, walls and floor of the bathrooms, toilets, kitchen, laundry and bedrooms, which would create a high risk to attract timber pests. The roof, the walls and the floor of the bathrooms, the toilets, the kitchen and the laundry created a very high risk for timber pests to attack the property. The moisture contents of southerly internal walls were high and the ventilation was poor. The floor was covered by timber, carpet and tiles. In the kitchen, there were stored goods; which obstructed the inspection. The interior of the property was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. The wall tiles in the bathrooms should be extended to ceiling height to minimize the risk of timber pest attack. Furthermore, regrouting for bathrooms was visible to prevent water to leak through the damaged grouts. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the interior to cause damages. In addition to the above, the interior of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pests attack.
4.1. The conditions in the subfloor created a very high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
4.4.4.5. In the subfloor, there were high moisture contents, poor ventilation, inadequate ant caps, timber formworks, cracked structures, scattered loose timbers, stored goods, leaves, thick dust, timber pests, dead termites, ants, watermarks and blemishes. Some new timber structures were installed in the subfloor. There were movements in the brickwork at the front and rear. There were timber structures to conceal the subfloor. The subfloor was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. The above may conceal possible damages and create a high risk to attract timber pest to attack the property. Furthermore, there was visible evidence of timber pest attack in the subfloor. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the subfloor to cause damages. In addition to the above, the subfloor of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
5.1. The conditions in the exterior of the property created a high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
5.3. Visible evidence of fungi working and damages were found in the fascia boards, eaves and exterior timbers of the property at the time of inspection. The fascia boards, eaves and exterior timbers should be inspected regularly to check for fungi attack.
5.5. On the exterior of the property, loose timbers on ground needed to be removed. There was visible evidence of timber pests attack in the exterior loose timbers. Timber pests, dead termites and ants appeared in the exterior of the property. There was mortar erosion and fretted walls, which would allow timber pest to get through. Some damp proof courses were visible on walls. The gutters and the down pipes needed to be cleaned up to enable rainwater to flow smoothly. Furthermore, whirl birds were recommended to install on the top of the roof. In addition to the above, the exterior of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
6.5. The fence should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
7.5. On the floor, there were cracks, which would allow timber pest to get through. Furthermore, the pavers were uneven on floor. In addition to the above, the floor should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
8.5.9.5. There was no Termite Protection Notice.
10.5. Visible evidence of timber pests working and damages were found in the rotten tree stumps at the time of inspection. Furthermore, the tree stumps must be removed to minimize the risk of termite attack. In addition to the above, the rotten tree stumps were to be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
12.5. The landscape needed to be improved and the vegetations were too close to walls, which may conceal damages of timber pest attack. In addition to the above, the landscape should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
14.4.14.5. The carport needed to be touched up. There were cracks in the carport. Furthermore, in the carport, there were stored goods, which obstructed the inspection. The carport was partly concealed or partly inaccessible. In addition to the above, the carport should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
17.5. The vegetations were to be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
18.5. There were some torn sarkings in the property. When raining, the water would leak through between the roof tiles, resulting in watermarks on the ceiling and walls. In addition to the above, there were watermarks in the property.
20.5. Visible evidence of timber pests working and damages were found in the property at the time of inspection. The termites may cause damages in concealed or inaccessible areas in the property. There was a high risk for termites to attack the property because the working distance of termites to attack property was about fifty meters. Furthermore, the moisture contents were high, the ventilation was poor, the subfloor conditions were poor, the tree stumps were rotten, and there were many trees around the property. The high moisture contents and poor ventilation of the property would attract termites to attack the property. Please note that the skillion roof was inaccessible. The roof void, the subfloor, the carport, the interior and the exterior of the property were partly concealed or partly inaccessible. There were cracks, which would allow timber pest to get through. In addition to the above, there was no sunlight on southerly walls; there was a high risk to attract termites. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the property to cause damages. A quarterly termite report and annual pest control services were a must. The installation of a Termite Protection Program was a must. The expected protection period of certain termiticides are eight years subject to at least quarterly termite reports.
评论
dingyixia
评论
求发言
评论
个人觉得便宜 多大的地啊
评论
地形，地势也很重要
评论
Mai
评论
這種破房子，發展商最愛！拆了一點都不可惜！
评论
Giving the conditions and preference, I did some researches:
The average price for 3 bedrooms is 1,030 K, 4 BR is 1,200 K and around 10% increase in the past year - but fell a little bit the year before last year.
700 is the average size but only few potential to have 2 dwellings in the future.
It is good for families which want a stable life.
So, if you want to stay here for a long time and then having babies, I assume you do not as you only mention you and your wife, you have to spend some grands to fix and refurnish the property. But the good news is there is no significant structural issue found in that inspection.
If you want to move to a better one in the future, this property only has limited investment potential.
So, if I were you, I would like to consider this one as a back up and then continue hunting in the market and then make the final decision.
Cheers
评论
楼主这样捂着藏着叫人怎么帮你建议。多少足友都只能盲人摸象的建议，如果给个地址大家也可以全方位提出建议嘛，难道还真怕大家抢你的么？
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年，华人区受影响！只能乘巴士（组图）
- 据《逐日电讯报》报导，从明年年中开始，因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
- 联邦政客们具有多少房产？
- 据本月早些时分报导，绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联