Now that I’ve got your attention, let me tell you how crazy my subject line is and why all of the doom-sayers have yet again got it wrong! Let’s begin…
Joe Hockey has called out “lazy” international analysts who are trashing Australia’s property market. He’s right. The recommendations of their “models” are actually laughable.
Basically, he told them to pull their finger out, or mind their own business.
While this is the same message he has for the long-term unemployed, I think he’s right on the money with this one.
More and more we hear the call from overseas that Australian property has caught a dreaded case of the bubbles.
But these calls are coming from institutions that don’t fully understand the reality of Australian property, and they’re based on simplistic rules of thumbs – what Hokey-Pokey rightly called “lazy analysis”.
Basically, these rules of thumb compare Australian house prices against incomes and rents. They do this simple calculation and then compare the results to other countries around the world. If Australia ranks highly, then there’s a bubble.
For example, at the end of last month, The Economist magazine reported that Australia had become “one of the most over priced housing markets in the world.”
How’d they figure that one out? Simple. They measured prices against rents, and concluded that Australia was a mind-blowing 55% over-valued. The only markets more expensive than ours were New Zealand, Canada, Belgium and Hong Kong.
They also compared prices against income. On that simple measure, they concluded that Australia is 33% overvalued – THE MOST OVER-VALUED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!
Sell! Sell! Sell! Sell property, buy tinned food and shotguns.
Madness.
Never mind that there are huge structural differences between Australia and the rest of the world. We have been able to spend big on property because the economy and a (relatively) honest and well-functioning banking system supports it.
We’re not Spain with massive unemployment, a demographic crisis and a financial system only one bad cheque away from a full-blown crisis.
And never mind that there are unique factors driving the Aussie market. As Hokey-Pokey points out, the main story in Australian property is the chronic shortage of housing.
“Australia fundamentally doesn’t produce enough houses to meet demand.”
Exactly Joe. I’m glad one of you mob gets it.
House prices might be high, but that doesn’t mean that the market is broken. It doesn’t mean that prices are “over-valued”, and it definitely doesn’t mean that there’s a ‘bubble’.
High prices are exactly what you get when we “fundamentally don’t have enough supply to meet demand.” That’s what a well-functioning market should deliver.
It’s a classic case of mis-diagnosis. The Economist looks at the symptom (high prices) and then deduces that these high prices must have come about through some sort of bubbly madness.
But I could look at the exact same data – the exact same symptoms – and build a “Land Release Efficiency Index” and conclude that Australia has one of the least efficient land release systems in the world.
The logic is just as faulty, but we’d end up a lot closer to the truth in Australia’s case.
But if you bought what The Economist was saying, what would you do? Well Australia is over-valued, so that’s a screaming sell. But where would you buy?
China.
If Australia is 33% overvalued, on the same measure China is 38% undervalued.
Bargain right?
No of course not. Buying into Chinese property is probably the worst thing you could do right now.
The Chinese have leveraged into property in a massive way in recent years, and there’s a staggering oversupply of housing in some markets. Everyone expects Chinese prices to fall over the next few years.
Some say that the market could collapse altogether.
Why? Because China does have the two key ingredients of a bubble – a massive and uncontrolled explosion in credit, and a massive over-supply of housing.
These two suspects were also at the crime scene around the collapse in US prices around the time of the GFC.
It’s also these two factors that make me confident about the Australian market. As I said, there’s a huge undersupply, and credit growth has been slowing, and is well down on pre-GFC levels.
I’ve never heard of a nation deleveraging into a bubble.
But with all that going on in China, in a massive and unpredictable way, you’d have to think that international agencies would be out there warning about the bubble in Chinese property. Nope. They’re telling everyone its massively ‘undervalued’.
Buy! Buy! Buy! What could go wrong?
Fair play to The Economist’s marketing team, though. One set of data punched out by the work-experience kid over the weekend, and you’ve got a front-page headline in every country in the world. It’s been getting huge mileage in Australia.
You just can’t buy that kind of publicity.
But it’s as reckless as it is lazy. If investors actually followed their “models”, they’d be selling out of the Australian market – a mature and proven market with excellent prospects, and buying China – a developing and unpredictable market with atrocious prospects.
I actually can’t think of worse advice.
(Maybe sell Aussie property, buy Nigerian inheritance options.)
So good on you Joe for calling them on it.
But now you’ve seen that we’re not building enough, what are you going to do about it? Who’s going to whip the states and the councils into line?
Are you going to be the first pollie to get serious about it?
I’m hopeful, but not holding my breath.
Does Aussie property seem over-valued to you? What measure should we be basing that on?
Is it a bubble?
评论
某位哥哥灿烂地笑了
评论
各种评论，只有时间才能证明了。谁说了都不算
评论
国内房价不是已经开始跌了吗
评论
hoho
评论
作者是谁都不知道的文章，看了你敢信？
看了2段，不忍直视
评论
Fair comment
评论
其实主要是说现在的经济学家都很不负责。有些说澳洲房价太高的其实只是单纯的把收入和房价作为比较，有些说房价还会涨的也只是以供应远远小于需求作为理由。
我个人觉得买房卖房都是人家的事情，不要随便建议人家买房但也不要随便建议人家不要买房。
那些决定买房或者不买的人也不要老听人家的建议。自己都这么大个人了，亏损自负。
有些人听了论坛里某些人的文章结果没有买房，这两年过去了肠子都悔青了，估计现在在咀咒哪个发文章的作者的全家呢。
评论
通篇bs. Australia is 33% overvalued, China is 38% undervalued. 砖家做在家里平空编两个数字然后自己在那里YY.
评论
最后不要译成中文，免得被大妈们看见。
评论
这种文章一看就是中介的软文，只能呵呵了。
评论
文章很有道理啊,基本和我的看法一样
评论
楼主去过文章作者的seminar吗
评论
去了一个她们和美国合作的讲座，不过讲解的不是作者。
确实能够学到点东西，只是太复杂了操作起来肯定有问题。
评论
评论
看看
评论
国内房产可不是想买就买的，至少一线几个城市都没松绑限购的条件呢，京沪好像还有户籍限制的吧~
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年，华人区受影响！只能乘巴士（组图）
- 据《逐日电讯报》报导，从明年年中开始，因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
- 联邦政客们具有多少房产？
- 据本月早些时分报导，绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联