ROAD RULES 2014 - REG 287
Duties of a driver involved in a crash
287 Duties of a driver involved in a crash
(1) A driver involved in a crash must comply with this rule.
: Maximum penalty--20 penalty units.
Note 1 :
"Crash" is defined in the Dictionary.
Note 2 : The law of this jurisdiction also requires a driver involved in a crash to stop and give assistance to anyone who is injured.
(2) The driver must stop at the scene of the crash and give the driver's required particulars, within the required time and, if practicable, at the scene of the crash, to--
(a) any other driver (or that driver's representative) involved in the crash, and
(b) any other person involved in the crash who is injured, or the person's representative, and
(c) the owner of any property (including any vehicle) damaged in the crash (or the owner's representative), unless, in the case of damage to a vehicle, the particulars are given to the driver of the vehicle (or the driver's representative).
(3) The driver must also give the driver's required particulars, within the required time, to a police officer if--
(a) anyone is killed or injured in the crash, or
(b) the driver does not, for any reason, give the driver's required particulars to each person mentioned in subrule (2), or
(c) the required particulars for any other driver involved in the crash are not given to the driver, or
(d) a vehicle involved in the crash is towed or carried away by another vehicle (except if another law of this jurisdiction provides that the crash is not required to be reported), or
(e) the police officer asks for any of the required particulars.
Note 1 :
"Police officer" is defined in the Dictionary.
Note 2 : Subrule (3) (e) is not uniform with the corresponding paragraph in rule 287 of the Australian Road Rules . However, the corresponding paragraph in the Australian Road Rules allows the required particulars to be given if another law of this jurisdiction requires a particular crash to be reported to a police officer. Different rules may apply in other Australian jurisdictions.
(4) For this rule--
"required particulars" , for a driver involved in a crash, means--
(a) the driver's name and address, and
(b) the name and address of the owner of the driver's vehicle, and
(c) the vehicle's registration number (if any), and
(d) any other information necessary to identify the vehicle,
and, for subrule (3), includes an explanation of the circumstances of the crash.
Note 1 :
"Driver's vehicle" is defined in the Dictionary.
Note 2 : This definition is not uniform with the corresponding definition in rule 287 of the Australian Road Rules . However, the corresponding definition in the Australian Road Rules allows the additional information to be provided to a police officer for the purposes of subrule (3) if another law of this jurisdiction requires the information to be given. Different definitions may apply in other Australian jurisdictions.
"required time" , for a driver involved in a crash, means as soon as possible but, except in exceptional circumstances, within 24 hours after the crash.
评论
一句话总结，发生交通意外的话事故双方有权登记对方的有效驾照信息，还有交换相互的联系方式。
评论
请仔细阅读条文再发表总结。
评论
这个，是没明说驾照，不过这些信息拿什么证明给对方看啊，不能只是口头说一下吧，最后还是给看驾照。
评论
当然是驾照啦。驾车的条件之一就是驾驶员必须带驾照。出了事自然是驾照的信息最有效，给护照也没地址和证明有驾车资格
评论
第四点不是有说任何有必要证明车主身份的文件么
评论
我问过新州的RMS，他们的说法是：
The Road Rules requirements are the minimum information a driver must provide following a crash and it is an offence not to provide these details.
The requirement to collect licence details following a crash is covered by “any other information necessary to identify the vehicle”. Sighting the drivers licence will assist in confirming the drivers details are correct and the driver is licensed to drive the vehicle.
其余等等。
不过他们也不是提供法律意见或者法律解释。
评论
是要证明车辆身份，不是车主。车牌号码就足够了。我开个其他人的车出去还带车主驾照或护照？
评论
哦哦是的，我没仔细看，确实没说到驾照。不过确实呀，有车辆牌照基本就跑不掉了。驾照感觉应该是保险公司会要的东西
评论
楼主，对于一般的司机，在现场，除了用驾照可以有效和信服的identify 自己的名字和地址，还有别的选择吗？
评论
Photo ID，呵呵，估计没几个人有。
评论
如果你借的车，那么rego 就知道车子的信息了。但是你作为司机的姓名和地址怎么证明呢？不还是得拿一个有地址和名字得证件么？
第一条就说明了是司机得姓名和地址啊。特别如果是比如说偷得车得话
评论
LZ会告诉你在新州还有ID card。
要是别人不给我看驾照，我会报警，都不需要和警察说无证驾驶，光说不提供驾照，警察分分钟到现场。哪怕是无过错方只要不提供驾照，酒精驾照牌照三件套，一个都少不了。警察来了还提供不了驾照的，那得恭喜了，哪怕无错方也成了有错方，不仅要吃罚单，还得赔对方车。
评论
其实这条法律应该改的更清楚明确一些，提供证明名字和地址的有效证件。或干脆规定必须出示驾照就省的大家推文咬字了，反正开车就应该拿驾照。
评论
以前一个帖子，好像没人受伤对方只肯口头提供名字和地址
打电话给警察，警察说有名字，地址就够了。。。。
评论
如果只是口头说名字和地址，万一是个骗子怎么办，到时候找谁去
评论
警察分分钟到现场？警察会告诉你自行交换信息。我手抄个地址给你也是交换信息。开罚单？ 你说开就开啊。呵呵。
再告诉你条法律。小事故。无需警察到场。你不可以强制对方留在现场。违法的。
评论
拍下/录下对方。去警察局核实。
评论
怎么证明他提供的信息是真的？
评论
我会告诉你：法律没有要求给你看ID。
只有警察可以看ID
评论
这种情况你要告诉警察 对方refuse 留下information，但是你记下了对方的车牌号。
这样警察就会给你个reference no. 你就可以报你的保险了- -
评论
就看个驾照，方便快捷，还发帖讨论那么多，搞什么飞机
评论
是这样的
刚来澳洲时，以为澳洲是个法制社会，人人遵守规章
时间长了，我就 呵呵 两字
评论
新的NSW Service App（就是电子驾照那个），可以扫描对方电子驾照QR Code 鉴别真伪的，前提是对方出示电子版的。
评论
总体来说，交换驾照是最便捷的方式，这个大家都认同的。所以，就是不成文的规则了。
任何一个正常人都会主动或者不反对交换驾照，拍照正反面。
如果真要找法律条文的话，现场翻交规不太实际吧？
评论
完全看不懂 这种帖子 的价值和意义
评论
不用较劲，规定就是规定。不是警察不能扣人，不能强行不让人走，不给你看，甚至不告诉你你也没辙，要跑也不能拦。当然可以报警，可以录像录音。
这么说吧，别人要违法犯罪，你也没有办法不让人做，你要是动手制止别人固然可以，制止本身或许也是违法犯罪。哪怕见义勇为也可能吃官司对吧。
评论
我覺得樓主鉆了牛角尖。
评论
對方不提供駕照，你就可以直接報警，負責任的警察會打電話讓對方把車開到警局來驗傷的。
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年，华人区受影响！只能乘巴士（组图）
- 据《逐日电讯报》报导，从明年年中开始，因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
- 联邦政客们具有多少房产？
- 据本月早些时分报导，绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联