澳洲耶伦证词偏鸽派:通胀是一大不确定因素 未来加

在澳大利亚证券外汇




7月12日,美联储主席耶伦在国会证词书面讲稿公布,耶伦称通胀对经济状况的反应是一大不确定因素,利率无需进一步升高太多即可达到中性状态。

针对近期较为疲软的通胀数据,耶伦在书面讲稿中指出,美联储密切关注通胀进展,对通胀持续低于2%的目标保持警惕,最近通胀稍有下降的部分原因在于有些项目价格出现异常下滑,这一表态与多数联储官员在6月FOMC会议的观点一致。耶伦强调,通胀是一大不确定性因素。

耶伦还认为,美国经济在二季度升温,预计经济在未来将继续温和增长,当前经济路径为进一步加息提供依据,利率无需进一步升高太多即可达到中性状态。未来几年则需要额外的渐进式加息。

至于缩表,耶伦的态度一如6月FOMC会议,称将在年内开始缩表,但表示资产负债表的最终规模暂未确定,还称不会将资产负债表用作主动政策工具。当月会议纪要显示,联储官员在何时启动缩表问题上存在意见分歧,并没有透露缩表启动的具体时间。证词公布前,瑞银报告称缩表细节可能在7月会议中决定。

耶伦书面证词基本符合市场预期,措辞偏鸽派,对通胀表示担忧,认为加息空间不大。分析认为,除非耶伦在问答环节给市场一个“惊喜”,十年期国债收益率不会变动太多。法巴银行Mortimer-Lee指出,耶伦证词意味着美联储9月不会行动。

北京时间周三22时,美联储主席耶伦将出席众议院听证会,随后则是与议员的问答环节;周四22时,耶伦还将出席参议院听证会。考虑到特朗普提名耶伦连任的可能性越来越小,这可能是耶伦任内最后一次在众议院金融服务委员会发表半年一次的汉弗莱-霍金斯证词。若耶伦不连任,其任期将在2018年2月结束。

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and other members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress. In my remarks today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook

Since my appearance before this committee in February, the labor market has continued to strengthen. Job gains have averaged 180,000 per month so far this year, down only slightly from the average in 2016 and still well above the pace we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labor force. Indeed, the unemployment rate has fallen about 1/4 percentage point since the start of the year, and, at 4.4 percent in June, is 5-1/2 percentage points below its peak in 2010 and modestly below the median of Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) participants’ assessments of its longer-run normal level. The labor force participation rate has changed little, on net, this year--another indication of improving conditions in the jobs market, given the demographically driven downward trend in this series. A broader measure of labor market slack that includes workers marginally attached to the labor force and those working part time who would prefer full-time work has also fallen this year and is now nearly as low as it was just before the recession. It is also encouraging that jobless rates have continued to decline for most major demographic groups, including for African Americans and Hispanics. However, as before the recession, unemployment rates for these minority groups remain higher than for the nation overall.

Meanwhile, the economy appears to have grown at a moderate pace, on average, so far this year. Although inflation-adjusted gross domestic product is currently estimated to have increased at an annual rate of only 1-1/2 percent in the first quarter, more-recent indicators suggest that growth rebounded in the second quarter. In particular, growth in household spending, which was weak earlier in the year, has picked up in recent months and continues to be supported by job gains, rising household wealth, and favorable consumer sentiment. In addition, business fixed investment has turned up this year after having been soft last year. And a strengthening in economic growth abroad has provided important support for U.S. manufacturing production and exports. The housing market has continued to recover gradually, aided by the ongoing improvement in the labor market and mortgage rates that, although up somewhat from a year ago, remain at relatively low levels.

With regard to inflation, overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures, increased 1.4 percent over the 12 months ending in May, up from about 1 percent a year ago but a little lower than earlier this year. Core inflation, which excludes energy and food prices, has also edged down in recent months and was 1.4 percent in May, a couple of tenths below the year-earlier reading. It appears that the recent lower readings on inflation are partly the result of a few unusual reductions in certain categories of prices; these reductions will hold 12-month inflation down until they drop out of the calculation. Nevertheless, with inflation continuing to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, the FOMC indicated in its June statement that it intends to carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward our symmetric inflation goal.

Looking ahead, my colleagues on the FOMC and I expect that, with further gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, the economy will continue to expand at a moderate pace over the next couple of years, with the job market strengthening somewhat further and inflation rising to 2 percent. This judgment reflects our view that monetary policy remains accommodative. Ongoing job gains should continue to support the growth of incomes and, therefore, consumer spending; global economic growth should support further gains in U.S. exports; and favorable financial conditions, coupled with the prospect of continued gains in domestic and foreign spending and the ongoing recovery in drilling activity, should continue to support business investment. These developments should increase resource utilization somewhat further, thereby fostering a stronger pace of wage and price increases.

Of course, considerable uncertainty always attends the economic outlook. There is, for example, uncertainty about when--and how much--inflation will respond to tightening resource utilization. Possible changes in fiscal and other government policies here in the United States represent another source of uncertainty. In addition, although the prospects for the global economy appear to have improved somewhat this year, a number of our trading partners continue to confront economic challenges. At present, I see roughly equal odds that the U.S. economy’s performance will be somewhat stronger or somewhat less strong than we currently project.

Monetary Policy

I will now turn to monetary policy. The FOMC seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability, as required by law. Over the first half of 2017, the Committee continued to gradually reduce the amount of monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, the FOMC raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at both its March and June meetings, bringing the target to a range of 1 to 1-1/4 percent. In doing so, the Committee recognized the considerable progress the economy had made--and is expected to continue to make--toward our mandated objectives.

The Committee continues to expect that the evolution of the economy will warrant gradual increases in the federal funds rate over time to achieve and maintain maximum employment and stable prices. That expectation is based on our view that the federal funds rate remains somewhat below its neutral level--that is, the level of the federal funds rate that is neither expansionary nor contractionary and keeps the economy operating on an even keel. Because the neutral rate is currently quite low by historical standards, the federal funds rate would not have to rise all that much further to get to a neutral policy stance. But because we also anticipate that the factors that are currently holding down the neutral rate will diminish somewhat over time, additional gradual rate hikes are likely to be appropriate over the next few years to sustain the economic expansion and return inflation to our 2 percent goal. Even so, the Committee continues to anticipate that the longer-run neutral level of the federal funds rate is likely to remain below levels that prevailed in previous decades.

As I noted earlier, the economic outlook is always subject to considerable uncertainty, and monetary policy is not on a preset course. FOMC participants will adjust their assessments of the appropriate path for the federal funds rate in response to changes to their economic outlooks and to their judgments of the associated risks as informed by incoming data. In this regard, as we noted in the FOMC statement last month, inflation continues to run below our 2 percent objective and has declined recently; the Committee will be monitoring inflation developments closely in the months ahead.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. However, such prescriptions cannot be applied in a mechanical way; their use requires careful judgments about the choice and measurement of the inputs into these rules, as well as the implications of the many considerations these rules do not take into account. I would like to note the discussion of simple monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process that appears in our current Monetary Policy Report.

Balance Sheet Normalization

Let me now turn to our balance sheet. Last month the FOMC augmented its Policy Normalization Principles and Plans by providing additional details on the process that we will follow in normalizing the size of our balance sheet. The Committee intends to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings by decreasing its reinvestment of the principal payments it receives from the securities held in the System Open Market Account. Specifically, such payments will be reinvested only to the extent that they exceed gradually rising caps. Initially, these caps will be set at relatively low levels to limit the volume of securities that private investors will have to absorb. The Committee currently expects that, provided the economy evolves broadly as anticipated, it will likely begin to implement the program this year.

Once we start to reduce our reinvestments, our securities holdings will gradually decline, as will the supply of reserve balances in the banking system. The longer-run normal level of reserve balances will depend on a number of as-yet-unknown factors, including the banking system’s future demand for reserves and the Committee’s future decisions about how to implement monetary policy most efficiently and effectively.
The Committee currently anticipates reducing the quantity of reserve balances to a level that is appreciably below recent levels but larger than before the financial crisis.

Finally, the Committee affirmed in June that changing the target range for the federal funds rate is our primary means of adjusting the stance of monetary policy. In other words, we do not intend to use the balance sheet as an active tool for monetary policy in normal times. However, the Committee would be prepared to resume reinvestments if a material deterioration in the economic outlook were to warrant a sizable reduction in the federal funds rate. More generally, the Committee would be prepared to use its full range of tools, including altering the size and composition of its balance sheet, if future economic conditions were to warrant a more accommodative monetary policy than can be achieved solely by reducing the federal funds rate.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

评论
九月照样加息。缩表照样进行,不信瞧着。

评论
坐等大胸的点评

评论
她发言怎么完全没有考虑大胸弟的感受。

评论
有意思,低通胀

评论
关键各大投行都认为美联储对通胀估计过于乐观

评论

当初不这么说椰奶就失业了。

评论
加元加息了。好不快活。

评论
没想到刷得还挺快

评论
米国又不加了 哪加拿大这么急着加息不就又打脸了

评论

一般来说加拿大最近就这一次加息

评论

所以今天澳币就涨了。

评论
大波妹,你快来说几句啊,有人怼你了

评论

有种预感椰奶干不久了

评论

椰奶说她有生之年看不到金融危机了,立下了flag就怕要打脸了

评论

说不定她的意思是这波金融危机是过不去了,08年到现在都没有恢复常态,看来以后是常年危机,偶尔好转。。
澳洲中文论坛热点
悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年,华人区受影响!只能乘巴士(组图)
据《逐日电讯报》报导,从明年年中开始,因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
联邦政客们具有多少房产?
据本月早些时分报导,绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联

证券外汇

证券外汇

Westpac数字卡动态CVC不可靠吗?

澳大利亚O.P. 在西太平洋银行标记欺诈交易并重新发行我的卡后,我刚刚在 Android 上设置了其中一个。 这个想法很棒,我对增加的安全性感到满意。 p> 但是 70% 的情况下,显示 CVV 的“数字卡”屏 ...

证券外汇

汽车金融、银行VS经销商?

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 我想为一辆新车获得融资,我的银行提供 6.49% 的汽车贷款利率,有人可以告诉我经销商通常为买家提供的利率是多少吗% 的利率? 我想知道是否值得询问经销商,因为我知 ...

证券外汇

放错地方

澳大利亚O.P. 我的妻子,随着阿尔茨海默氏症的早期发作,在我们外出之前,将她的信用卡放在房子里的某个地方说。 我们已经颠倒了房子。 我上网看看如何报告。当然,它要求信用卡号。我们 ...

证券外汇

资产测试的时间?购买家庭住宅B4退休?

澳大利亚O.P. 您的初始资产测试何时完成? 当您67岁时?或当您“退休”时? - (停止工作)? 如果我推迟退休说68,我将回顾我所拥有的67年资产,还是当前的超级资产(非常低的超级资产)数 ...

证券外汇

违反税收居住后出售Inv物业?

澳大利亚O.P. 我有这种情况。我的一个朋友要永久移居海外。他将打破其税务居民身份,并开始在新的居住国(美国)缴纳所得税。 在美国,您持有超过一年的任何投资房产都需要缴纳长期资本 ...

证券外汇

IBKR确实令人沮丧

澳大利亚O.P. 我在盈透证券开设了一个经纪账户来交易美国股票,最近我开始进行期权交易(只是出售备兑看涨期权和看跌期权),但 IBKR 非常令人沮丧,不会让我进入期权交易,即使 现在已经 ...

证券外汇

15年后,CGT进行中小企业清算

澳大利亚O.P. 朋友/专家, 想了解:澳大利亚资本利得税 15 年规则中小企业 https://www.ato.gov.au/bu sinesses-and-organizations/i ncome-deductions-and-concess ions/incentives-and-concessi ons/small-business-cgt-conce ssions/small ...

证券外汇

欺诈交易绕过SMS安全性

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 我想知道黑客或诈骗者是否有办法绕过银行机构发送的 6 位数短信代码? 致给你背景信息——我注意到我的西太平洋银行卡上有两笔来自伊斯坦布尔的交易,总计约 200 美 ...

证券外汇

Visa 借记卡作为政策已张贴预激活..?

澳大利亚O.P. 我的卡本月即将到期,Ubank(86400/nab)给我发送了一张新卡,但是它已被激活并从我的邮箱中偷走了。 我只知道某事已经起了,因为我从未去过的15分钟之外的超市批准了5C交易。 我 ...

证券外汇

自费课程报销计算

澳大利亚O.P. 我想获得一个估计,我会在纳税申报表时回到口袋里以自给我的工作直接相关的课程。 课程的费用IS $ 3,357.50 + GST($ 3,693.25含GST)。 说,如果我的薪水正好为$ 135,001 + super。例如在 ...

证券外汇

Woolworths 信用卡?

澳大利亚O.P. 您好 我只是想知道是否有人在使用woolworths信用卡时有过任何正面、负面、冷漠的经历或想法? 其他地方的评论似乎是负面的,因为注册过程。 我不是在寻找积分,而是在寻找定期 ...

证券外汇

股票——不是常见的问题。

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 希望能在这方面为我指明正确的方向。 大约 20 年前,我的母亲留下了很多联邦银行股票。我根本不知道她之前持有这些股票多久了……可能很多年了。 我已经 70 多岁了, ...

证券外汇

税务居民身份和税务影响

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 我是一名 IT 顾问,过去 10 年一直在我现在的公司工作。在过去的四年里,我把“在家工作”带到了海外,在巴基斯坦和父母一起工作了相当长的一段时间。 我最近几年的 ...

证券外汇

NRMA 保险

澳大利亚O.P. 在 20 分钟的音乐和三下点击后,刚刚从 NRMA 挂断电话 – 接线员正在检查我是否还有耐心和生存意愿? 六位数的 PIN 码出现并消失,但没有 PIN 码出现打电话时第二次在手机上。 带有 ...

证券外汇

NAB 信用卡欺诈检测政策?

澳大利亚O.P.这篇文章已编辑 我已经成为 NAB 客户几十年了,直到现在我的 2x VISA 信用卡都没有出现任何问题,想知道这里是否有人在 NAB 或其他信用卡提供商那里遇到过这个问题。 最近,我将其 ...

证券外汇

400 万美元的巨额养老金余额仍在运作

澳大利亚O.P. 如果您有一笔非常大的退休金余额,但需要很多年才能提取它,您会怎么做? 这会如何改变您的生活? 如何改变您的生活?这会改变你的工作吗? 当你年轻且无法获得资金时,你会 ...

证券外汇

资本利得税

澳大利亚O.P. 我和妻子购买了土地,并以业主身份建造了我们的第一套房子。我们搬进来并在我们的房子里住了 19 个月,发布了出租广告,然后搬回了我父母的房子。 如果我在 6 年内搬回来,我 ...

证券外汇

便携式设备的独立保险?

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 我最近买了一支 Apple Pencil 和一台 iPad Air。我妈妈试图将它们添加到 NAB(由安联运营)的家庭和财物保单的便携式设备中,但他们说这会使保费增加约 300 美元。 我想知道 ...