新西兰我想买辆nissan tiida,但看到有AT 和CVT,请问各位高手
在新西兰
我想买辆nissan tiida,但看到有AT 和CVT,请问各位高手买哪种好? 还有1.5S是什么意思? 请指教,谢谢.
评论
nissan 的cvt算 cvt当中比较吊的了。建议选择cvt，cvt也是未来的技术。cvt省油。但是保养的时候贵，要常换cvt油，还得要原厂的cvt油。
评论
一定择传统AT，Nissan的AT保养不贵，不要常换油，也不限死你要用原厂油，耐操，又不用担心传动钢带断裂问题。
不了解这个版为什么那么多人着迷CVT，又害人叫人买CVT
50年代已经有CVT，只有傻瓜才说CVT是很吊的新科技
评论
http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles/automatics-cvt-transmissions
CVT Transmissions
Back in the 1950s, some automatic transmissions had only two gears. Two-speed transmissions were a pain, because when you were going up a hill you only had two options: first or second gear; it screamed in first gear or lost power in second. Then, as you went faster, the transmission was screaming because it needed an extra gear but didn’t have one.
Two-speed automatics were not only inconvenient to use, but they robbed the car’s engine of much of its power and drank fuel like there was no tomorrow.
You may never notice it, but your four or five-speed automatic suffers from the same problems as the two-speed one described above: it never gets the gears quite right. That’s why cars with conventional automatics never put out quite as much power as those with a manual gearbox and almost always use more fuel.
In the 1950s, a Dutch company called DAF came up with a new type of automatic transmission that solved the problems described above. Instead of having a small, fixed number of gears, DAF’s gearbox simply made up the gearing as it went along; the DAF transmission could change itself internally to produce a wide range of different gears, each one perfectly suited to the road conditions and driving style of that vehicle. The Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) was born.
There are no fixed gears (e.g., first, second, third, and so on) in a CVT. The transmission simply invents the right gear at the right time. In theory a CVT is the ideal gearbox.
In practice, however, most modern CVT gearboxes suffer from the same problems as their ancestors: because they don’t have gears (like on the back wheel of a bicycle), many CVTs use belts instead, like the one that goes around your waist. The problem is, these transmission belts break, no matter how well they’re made. When they break, the whole transmission has to come out, generally for a complete overhaul at great expense. CVT gearboxes that use chains are better, but they still break.
The carmakers knew this when they put these CVT transmissions onto the market, but they also knew that most of the CVTs wouldn’t break until the vehicle was out of guarantee, meaning it wouldn’t be the carmakers’ problem. However, even that scam didn’t work: both Nissan’s and Honda’s CVTs have been subject to multiple recalls, some on almost-new vehicles. It’s possible that someone will eventually figure out how to build a CVT transmission that lasts as long as a conventional manual gearbox, but we’re not holding our breath. In the meantime, the evidence to date suggests that CVT transmissions can easily become a nightmare for car owners.
The fact that many CVT transmissions die young shouldn’t be your problem; the easiest option is to simply avoid CVT transmissions entirely!
评论
怎么区分cvt 和AT 呢 我是05年1.8的
评论
如果你在车行和拍卖行，会讲得很清楚是AT或者CVT。某些带CVT的车，后面也会有个章标明是CVT
评论
据说cvt在新西兰水土不服，经常出问题。
评论
cvt sux.................. stick to the old school at
评论
还是建议不要整天拿这篇文章到处贴，多看看其它的文章。CVT是未来的趋势。这点是没错的。保养贵。
评论
Cvt 是为了省油 Auto的耐用
评论
保养贵就不应该害人叫人家买，为什么你那么迷恋CVT？
只要消费者不被蒙骗，不买炕钱的机械设计，车厂就不会生产炕钱的的车
评论
我觉得呢，CVT不好的话，NISSAN公司早就倒闭了
我看TRADEME上面 售车的，TOYOTA最多，NISSAN第二多。。
评论
TIIDA推荐CVT版本，因为配置好，CVT波箱性能可靠，油耗低，使用经济，当然价格可能比AUTO的高一些，但不是很大差距， 1.5S的意思是1.5L standard (标准配置）
评论
你开车时候加速时候会有明显的换挡 那就是AT。 CVT是感觉不到换挡的
评论
我还成害人了，唉，不是说了，cvt是未来趋势和省油嘛，就是保养要原厂cvt油嘛。 以前的cvt确实不行，现在的基本都没问题了。而且，lz的那个排量小成那样，能有啥问题啊。
评论
CVT几百年前就有了
评论
不过换档的顿挫真让人受不了，我4AT的二手日本车，真让人烦
评论
ddddddddddddddd
评论
开手波的路过······
评论
我肯定买cvt。尼桑cvt不错的。是未来的大势所趋。
cvt历史悠久不等于说cvt就是老技术。那电池+电机驱动方式，150多年前就有了呢，更老。怎么混合动力车用得欢呢？
尼桑敢押宝在cvt上不是没有理由的。90年代尼桑已经开始用cvt，到今天至少15年过去了，也可说尼桑的cvt技术经过了时间的检验，而尼桑的cvt技术和信心都有增无减，大中小排量统统上cvt，无论如何都是值得相信的。
信尼桑还是信板凳、或者是信地板的文章，你选吧。我信尼桑。
评论
cvt不是新科技，但当今尼桑的cvt绝对可以说是很吊的新科技。50年代的cvt可以和当今的比吗？那么好赖。。。汽车100年前就有了呢，照你这么说 当今汽车都是没有技术含量的过时东西咯？
评论
雷诺收购后设计和生产的尼桑，已经不值得相信
评论
是哦！所谓高科技只是炕钱，强迫人家买新车的手段
评论
那CVT起步会溜后，行车期间档位变来变去就不烦后
评论
哪里几百年？你在开玩笑吧
评论
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuously_variable_transmission
1490年发明的
评论
我开过的nissan cvt怎么不会起步溜车呢？停在ct上坡路上不踩刹车都能停得住
评论
还是达芬奇发明的呢 哈哈哈！
评论
只要可靠、耐操、为护成本低，那是值得推荐给穷人，想想纽西兰多少穷人需要买部可靠、为护成本低的二手车代步。穷人买车，不能做汽车科技的白老鼠
但如果你是有钱人，买得起外形很吸引人，科技很先进的新车，车坏了有原厂保修。如果那些有钱的，愿意做汽车科技的白老鼠，也是消费者的选择
评论
两年内没问题不表示四年内没问题
说到底，我不明白，一句：“未来科技趋势”，就哄骗到那么多人，迷恋一种有先天性缺憾的汽车科技（不要说CVT，马自达买下的转子引擎技术也是先天性存在耗油问题），一种消费者不应该追捧的汽车科技